Pistol vs. Active Shooter With Body Armor And A Rifle? Myths & Facts

Let’s get real.  Very few people want to be in a gunfight.  Even special operations works hard to avoid “gunfights.”  They’ll set up ambushes at the time and place of their choosing where they can use speed, surprise, and violence of action, sniping, indirect fire, grenades, charges, and flash bangs to minimize the chances of a true toe-to-toe fight.

A “fight” implies that the playing field is level and that effective fire is going in both directions.

If you do get into a gunfight, you want intel, armor, overwatch, long guns, an assortment of grenades, and a trained team that can shoot, move, and communicate.

You don’t want to get into a gunfight alone, armed with a pistol.  Ever.  Against ANY gun.

That being said, I believe that you should train for that worst case scenario.


Because if you only train for averages, extreme situations will shove you out of your comfort zone.

But if you train for the extremes, average situations will take care of themselves.

What about body armor?

Body armor does a few things, but one of the biggest things that soft body armor does is that it changes the impact point from being the tip of the bullet to being about the size of a tennis ball.  Plates can increase the impact point to roughly the size of the plate.

You still absorb almost all of the energy of the bullet…just over a bigger area.  Instead of getting a hole poked in you, it’s like getting jabbed with the end of a baseball bat.  A PJ friend of mine has taken multiple AK rounds to the chest.  He says that feels like he imagines it would feel to have someone take a swing at your chest with a baseball bat.  He obviously lived, but he didn’t laugh it off.

With soft body armor, it’s common for people to be shocked and freeze for a couple of seconds, get the wind knocked out of them, have ribs broken, etc.

Rated body armor allows for the body armor to deform 44mm into the body.

Practically, that means that the ribs are getting pushed in enough to displace the heart.

One common saying is that soft body armor is designed to keep you alive.  Hard body armor is designed to keep you in the fight.

So, just because an attacker has soft body armor on doesn’t mean you shouldn’t start by shooting center mass.

That first hit will, at least, interrupt their OODA loop and may cause them to freeze momentarily.  As we’ve repeatedly seen, most murderers slow down or completely stop at the first sign of effective resistance.

Should you stop there?  No.  There’s no one-size-fits-all answer, but that first shot to the vest could easily be thought of as a jab…you may get lucky and it may finish the fight, but more than likely it’s going to set up your next shot(s)…

One of the purposes of a center-mass shot on a moving attacker is to slow down the head.  Shooting an active shooter wearing a vest center mass may allow you to follow up with a headshot, if necessary.

Don’t want to take the head shot?  Thighs and hips are a perfectly viable option to stop a threat.  They’re not as effective as the upper chest and head, but every time you put another round into an attacker, the more likely you’ll interrupt their OODA loop and stop them from continuing their assault.

A shot to body armor may allow you to close distance.

It may allow you to get to cover.

But whatever you do, don’t let the presence of body armor on a bad guy make you think that he’s invincible.  You have to have the attitude that you’re going to come out on top.

5 Little Known Facts about Bad Guys & Body Armor

Some bad guys have good armor and good fitting armor, but bad-guy body armor tends to be different (sometimes VERY different) than good-guy body armor.  This can be huge…

  1. Police body armor should all be NIJ tested and certified.  Many departments destroy their armor when it reaches end-of-life.  As a result, civilian body armor that bad guys tend to buy tends to be inferior to “real” body armor.  That means that a bad guy may be wearing body armor designed to stop a .44 magnum, but your 9mm may cause enough back-face deformation to seriously injure him, break ribs, and change behavior.  Notice the use of the words “tends to” and “may.”  There are no guarantees.
  2. Police body armor has very little margin around the edges where there is no protection.  Cheapo Chicom body armor can have as much as 2″ of non-ballistic plastic around the edge to make the armor cheaper/lighter.
  3. Theoretically, a bullet could push body armor completely through the body and the body armor would have, technically, kept the bullet from passing through.  Back-face deformation is how much the armor pushes into you after the front is shot.  It is MUCH greater on bad-guy Chicom armor than police armor.
  4. Steel plates are heavy, reduce mobility, and cause spalling if they don’t have enough anti-spalling covering.  Spalling is the ricochet that happens when the bullet hits something harder than itself, breaks up, and splatters.  It’s lead & copper.  When it goes into the neck/inside of the arm of the wearer, it can create an immediate change in behavior.  This is common when people buy cheap plates and attempt homemade anti-spalling coatings or don’t use any anti-spalling.
  5. If the bad guy was sitting with body armor on, it’s likely that everything from their belly-button down is not covered when they’re standing.  This creates a larger target area when engaging the pelvis.

Prey vs. Predator

All active shooters are different, but I believe that all of them have a movie that’s played out in their head dozens of times where they dominate everyone around them and exert their will with impunity.  Their manifestos reveal some of this…even when they’re counting on being killed.

In their movie, they are the apex predator and everyone else is prey.  It’s like finishing a video game on the novice level and thinking you’re something special…until you run up against someone who actually knows what they’re doing..  And the notes that they leave ahead of time makes me think that most have either planned to run, commit suicide, or commit suicide by cop at the first sign of resistance.

It may not be 100% accurate, but that model explains why active shooters pick the targets they do and why they respond to resistance the way they do.

And I hope it encourages you to fight rather than freeze if you ever find yourself in an active shooter situation.  Flip the tables…decide not to be prey and take the fight to them.

What’s the biggest thing you can do to survive an active shooter situation if you’re armed with only a pistol and running isn’t an option?

It’s training so that your shooting skills become conditioned responses…reflexive…so that you can perform at a high level under extreme stress without having to think about it.  Humans rarely, if ever, “rise to the occasion” in life or death stress.  They revert back to what they trained or they behave unpredictably if they didn’t train.

Is that important to you?

After recent attacks, do you see how some nut could do the same thing at your school, church or another event you’re at?

Do you want to develop the skills that will let you make effective hits on target with a pistol at longer-than-bad-breath distances in a fraction of the time as what’s possible with live-fire-only training?

Than I want to strongly encourage you to check out our Dynamic Gunfight Training.  You’ll be thankful you did.

Using normal methods, it takes thousands of rounds of live fire and hundreds of hours to develop reflexive shooting skills, but with our at-home training that incorporates more than a dozen accelerated learning hacks, you can do it in only minutes a day for a fraction of what it would cost with traditional range training.  Get started now and start being better prepared by this weekend by clicking >HERE<

Ready for training originally developed for an elite military training command?  With shooting-on-the-move skills right out of your favorite action flick…except real?  Then you want to check out Praxis by clicking >HERE<

Questions?  Comments?  Please share them by commenting below:

Please follow and share:
Pin Share


  • Stephen Rohner

    Reply Reply August 2, 2023

    In my training class I always tell my students that if a bad guy has amour on they shoot 2 or 3 to the pelvis area, then if they still have their firearm in their hand, they will be bent over then 1 to the top of the head.


    • Ox

      Reply Reply August 9, 2023

      I like how you’re thinking. A couple of tweaks I’d consider…

      1. I wouldn’t discourage them from engaging center mass first, even if the bad guy has armor on. The more branching scripts you give people, the more lag it will introduce until they’ve had enough practice identifying the behaviors in real-world contexts.

      Basically, what I’m saying is that if your branching script is to take a head shot if it’s a sure thing. If not, engage center mass until the behavior changes or the head slows down enough to be a sure thing. — That is simpler than saying, If they don’t have body armor on, do x. If they do have body armor on, do y.

      2. For the untrained shooter, it’s very likely that they’re going to shoot low and towards their support hand. Shooting center mass gives us more margin for error. For the more experienced shooter, there’s not as much difference.

      3. The bent over shooting sequence is incredibly dependent on context. I’m not sure if I’d practice that on paper. Here’s why…
      a. You don’t know whether the hit will change behavior at all, turn off the lights temporarily, turn off the lights permanently, cause them to bend at the waist, or drop like a marionette after the strings are cut like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4iZtRCyjz4 but still be a threat. (Notice the speed that he goes from running to prone.) If a shooter only trains for one of these, they’re going to automate the process and they’re going to be likely to execute the process without the ability to change it under stress if the threat has a different response to being shot.
      b. That transition to the head shot and taking the head shot must involve visual discernment or it won’t transfer over to real world situations as effectively. The easiest way to train this is by doing live-action role-playing in the classroom with completely inert laser pistols like https://DryFirePistol.com

  • rod vanzeller

    Reply Reply August 2, 2023

    On your first story, advancing was the key, when your drop your fear the other guy picks it up

    • Ox

      Reply Reply August 9, 2023

      I like that. Great analogy!

  • geoff

    Reply Reply February 23, 2023

    I note that, in many cases, the amount of ammo the BG had is included in the article. I fail to see why that is relevant in any way. IMO, by posting this needless information, the gun-ignorant public begins to see that kind of ammo count as inherently evil. Such numbers are far less than we routinely own for the gun shooting side of society. Give us a break.

    • Ox

      Reply Reply February 23, 2023

      I agree with what you’re saying, and at the same time, I personally like knowing as many details as possible.

  • David

    Reply Reply February 23, 2023

    This was an exemplary and sobering series of accounts of shootings and aftermath. I hope that anyone involved uses USCCA Membership or loads of cash in the aftermath of any “righteous” shooting. God Bless you all.

    • Ox

      Reply Reply February 23, 2023

      Yes…and is constantly thinking about AEIO and when it is and is not appropriate to draw and possibly discharge a firearm in public.

  • AF Dave

    Reply Reply August 5, 2019

    Luke 22:36 “But now,… and whoever does not have a sword must sell his coat and buy one.”

  • Inspektor

    Reply Reply March 16, 2018

    Thanks for those answer, that makes sense.

  • Alan Henning

    Reply Reply March 3, 2018

    I’ve had the opportunity to take care of a badly rattled cop, that had a shooter come out of the front door firing. He was EXTREMELY fortunate, that he wasn’t killed. But, he had been hit.
    We placed him in our truck, and started to get him stripped down. I figured he had taken a round to his vest, but it was pristine. I informed him that he had no leaks, anywhere. He insisted that he had been hit. There was one thing missing, when we loaded him in the medic, his gunbelt. One of the other officers had placed it in his trunk. The 9 mm round was still lodged, between his handgun and the belt, in the leather holster. But, this shows how much any impact has on that OODA loop.
    Also, most vests, only cover you down to, just above your belly button. So, a center mass shot, that goes a bit South, is going to make the assailant have a very bad day.

  • left coast chuck

    Reply Reply March 2, 2018

    Ox: You are certainly right. I wouldn’t want a Marine 0311 messing around in the cockpit of any a/c I was about to embark on. On the other hand if I were engaged in a firefight with a bad guy a couple or three 0311s providing maneuver and fire cover would be more welcome than a finance clerk who skipped rifle range due to bad weather and had never handled a firearm in his life. Not to sound like an old salt, but the last time I qualified while on Okinawa a typhoon was approaching and we had to cut our week at the range (I was a Remington raider) a day short. From the 500 yard line all six flags were flying in different directions. It didn’t matter if you were a Remington raider or a wing wiper, you still had to qualify once a year. I always liked going to the range. You got to shoot and the ammo was free. How much better can it get? It used to be you got $10 a month extra if you shot expert which was a big deal if you were pulling down less than a hundred a month and it was a really big deal if you were getting $33 a month which was base pay for a private at that time.

    • Ox

      Reply Reply March 2, 2018

      Awesome, Chuck. Thanks!

  • Rod P

    Reply Reply March 2, 2018

    1994 Fairchild AFB Spokane, Wa. USAF Security Officer Andy Brown shot and killed Dean Mellberg from 70 yds with a 9mm Berretta. Melberg had killed 5 and wounded 22 using a MAK-90, reportedly with a 75 round magazine. Brown fired after Mellberg had turned his weapon toward Brown and began firing.
    And the list goes on.
    Not all USAF personnel can be so easily categorized as something less than brave and competent.

    • Ox

      Reply Reply March 2, 2018

      Awesome! I agree 100% on your last statement. My brother went to the Zoo. And I’ve had the pleasure of knowing and working with several pilots, security forces, PJs, Combat Controllers, TAC-Ps, SERE instructors, and others who are very competent and proven. But none of them would make the claim that they became great riflemen during basic training. The rifle training was…”basic.” It’s not necessarily a good or bad thing…it’s just a matter of resource allocation. The people who will be in the greatest need of more-than-basic rifle skills get the training and people who are less likely to need it don’t. Now I know that there’s a TON of inter-service rivalry and every branch likes to bash on the other, but the fact is, they’re all different and they can’t all be good at everything.

      • Rod P

        Reply Reply March 2, 2018

        Well put. I figured that your backgeound probably provided the opportunity for you to be well aware of that. My son was a combat controller, but to be honest I’d never heard of them until he informed me what he had decided he wanted to do. Happy that he made back safely from his tours.

        • Ox

          Reply Reply March 3, 2018

          You should be very proud of your son. If you’ll allow me to share, I’ve had the privilege to work, play and train with AFSOC guys for more than 20 years. Early on, I decided I was meant to be to either be a PJ or CC. I got to where I was maxing out their PT Qual for my daily workout. But it was during the Clinton years and when I tried to enlist, they tore up my paperwork because I admitted to using an inhaler 6-8 years prior. I was in incredible shape, but they wouldn’t let me in any branch to be a cook, let alone a PJ or CC. Things have a way of working out, though. Since then, I’ve been close to death with health issues a hand-full of times…most of which were pneumonia where I was hospitalized and/or on O2. There’s a good chance that my lung issues would have reared it’s head downrange in a situation where it would have hurt more than just me.

          So, yes, a lot of people poke at the marksmanship skills of people who served in the Air Force, and in some cases it’s deserved, but there are groups within the Air Force that take marksmanship skills as seriously as the Marines or Army, but ALWAYS have a little extra incentive to push their skills further because of the fact that they’re thought of as the underdog.

          CCs have been a HUGE force multiplier in the GWOT and they’ve been responsible for saving thousands of lives. And, again, you should be very proud of your son.

  • Old Sarge

    Reply Reply March 2, 2018

    The training that my department received two years ago was very specific. First on scene, first to the fight. Hunt and stop all active threats. Do not stop for anyone bleeding or screaming. Once the threat is neutralized it is placed in restraints, it’s weapons secured, and actively covered, until the arrest team arrives to take it away. Our A/S kits came with a rifle, pistol, vest, and shield. During a recent drill I pointed out that there should be two vests per kit to allow a second Officer to take the pistol and hunt the threat, a force multiplier.
    Our local F.D. trains with us and they are equipped and trained to triage in the “hot zone”. In none of this training were we ever told to wait for the SWAT guys, ever!
    I dry fire 15 minutes a day, our group goes to the range once a month and while most of our pistol work is done inside the 25 yard line, I always push them back to the hundred yard line to get them accustomed to making long shots.

    • Ox

      Reply Reply March 2, 2018

      Thanks, Sarge.

  • G

    Reply Reply November 23, 2017

    Never assume that just because you only wound a gang member instead of killing them that the gang won’t retaliate.

  • Jim Ponczek

    Reply Reply November 13, 2017

    Good info, as always.

    Like many do, I train for what I expect an encounter to be. Meaning, I train to see my sights and fire as quickly and accurately as I can at distances between 15 and 30 feet. Typical ‘house’ distances. I train left & right barricade, with/without flashlight, strong and weak hand.

    What I’ve ceased doing it training for the long shots because long shots are not possible in close quarter handgun battle.

    It does pose the question, though… how accurate are you with a pistol at longer range? The story of the mounted policeman was interesting but you can’t count on luck or God’s intervention to make up for your bad aim. His story ended happily Most do not.

    So, my next trip to the range will have to include some longer range practice. Maybe once it gets warm again I’ll venture to the outdoors and shoot the way I learned – 50′ target with a 2″ snubbie! It was all my dad had and it made me a better shooter.

  • David Durkop

    Reply Reply November 12, 2017

    From a law enforcement view, you have to able to verbalize why you are shooting someone. There is a big difference between the pharmacist in Oklahoma and an active shooter in a church.

    Few jurisdictions are going to prosecute someone who shoots these one of these shooters, at least in Texas. California, New Jersey, New York and a few other jurisdictions may be different.

    The key element is mindset. Are you willing to kill someone? An active shooter is not the time to make that decision. Remember that you have your own OODA loop and need to be constantly evaluating what is going on. “If this happens, then I am going to do this.” It is not a constant or static situation. It is always evolving and is constantly being updates. Much like flying, you have to be a head of the game.

    Have you trained to shoot from awkward positions? Are you willing to take a shot when there is a high probability that you are going to hit a hostage before taking down the bad guy? At what distance? The church I go to, the shot could be 200 to 250 feet. Are you willing to take that shot?

    This is a whole different ball game than a highjacking of the local Stop N Rob store.

  • Jackie

    Reply Reply November 10, 2017

    One of my very best friends, a 67 year old outdoors woman, is afraid to carry in church because someone told her in Oklahoma it’s illegal, even with a CCP. I told her not true, but she chooses not to because there are three armed police officers on the three doors.
    I tried explaining that police carry pistols to protect themselves, not you. When will people keep their misinformation to themselves?

    • Ox

      Reply Reply November 10, 2017

      Even if it is illegal, it’s worth checking to see HOW illegal it is.

      Is it a low grade misdemeanor trespassing charge where the first consequence is being asked to leave and the worst is a ticket? Is it a misdemeanor that could include jail time? Is it a felony?

      It’s important to realize that you could have 3 businesses, all right next to each other, where the consequences of carrying are completely different. Just imagine having a Federal courthouse next to a bar next to a coffee shop. All 3 of which have “no guns” signs but each of the 3 could potentially have different consequences for carrying concealed.

  • Threequarterton

    Reply Reply November 10, 2017

    With a defeatest attitude like the pastor has YOU ARE DEAD before the shooting starts !!
    If these killers are Wolves are You a SHEEP or are You A SHEEP DOG??

  • Rick Carlton

    Reply Reply November 9, 2017

    Yhe last thing I want to do is shoot/kill someone. They may be part of a gang or family who seeks revenge. The civil and legal results are unpredictable.

    However, if I must, I want to stop the attack with justifiable force but not necessarily a kill shot. If I could run them off, all the better.

  • Richard Crutchfield

    Reply Reply November 9, 2017

    Thanks for the good advice. I pray that such a mentally ill person never enters our place of worship with the intent to kill.

    • left coast chuck

      Reply Reply November 9, 2017

      Might I be so bold to suggest that you open a dialog with the church elders or whoever is in charge of the administration of the church regarding armed deacons during church services in addition to prayers. I believe there is a verse somewhere in the bible about God helping those who help themselves. Many people use that as an excuse to steal. I believe it absolutely does not mean that at all, but it means that God will help you in the security of your church if you help yourself in the security of your church. Praying is fine after you have arranged for armed security for the various services your church offers. It doesn’t have to be a visible armed presence that makes everyone nervous, but a discrete body of armed deacons or whatever you want to call them to protect the services. Face it, religion is under attack from many sources, including violent attacks.

      • Harold

        Reply Reply November 11, 2017

        That Bible verse does not exist. You are correct, it is bad theology. God helps everyone, but we still have to face the consequences for our actions. God does not issue “Get out of Jail Free” cards.

  • James Garvin

    Reply Reply November 9, 2017

    “Oklahoma City pharmacist Jerome Ersland was convicted of first-degree murder in the May 19, 2009 shooting death of a would-be robber, 16-year-old Antwun Parker, while Parker was incapacitated and lying on his back. Ersland is serving a life sentence in prison.” There was an older man involved who was “mentoring” this kid and put him up to the robbery. The important thing here is that if Erslund had not come from behind the counter to bend down and fire his pistol several more times into Parker, he’d be a free man today even if Parker had died.

  • JJM

    Reply Reply November 9, 2017

    Great summary of resistance and potential response the attacker will exhibit. Best advice is “Don’t Freeze” like a deer in headlights. Hope I wouldn’t Freeze but Flight or Fight, anything except willingness to immediately Fight would be major self failure.

    • Ox

      Reply Reply November 9, 2017

      I want to encourage you with the fact that you WILL freeze. Your startle-flinch response will happen and you WILL freeze. The question is, how long will you freeze? Will it be a fraction of a second because you’ve programmed your startle-flinch response, toned your limbic system, and done stress inoculation, or will it be longer?

      Everyone, regardless of their exposure to life & death situations can benefit ON A DAILY BASIS from training their limbic system and doing simple, easy stress inoculation, but few do. Most will choose not to. That’s not necessarily a failure…it’s just the fact that human beings are not homogeneous and exist on a spectrum. If you’re wired such that you’re on the end of the spectrum that makes you more likely to respond, then I encourage you to do what you can to feed your natural tendency to respond in a way that will protect those on the other end of the spectrum.

    • Stephen Harwood

      Reply Reply March 2, 2018

      As an armed guard here in NYC, we’re taught to stop the threat period!
      Once there is no threat, you stop shooting.. if they’re still alive you become they’re biggist fan.
      Going for that kill shot, and if you have a history of practicing those shots will get you a a room at rikers island.. even if it was justified… heck even drawing your weapon in the line of duty here is automatic jail time.
      Stop the threat don’t cjase them down..
      We’re not Leo’s.

      • Ox

        Reply Reply March 2, 2018

        Hey Stephen, was that meant to be a reply to JJM or to a different comment?

  • Dano

    Reply Reply November 9, 2017

    Ox your response to Dave is the reason that some of us are prosecuted and lose everything as opposed to those who can reasonable explain our actions and go home to sleep with our families and are exonerated. We just did what was necessary to STOP the threat. Excellent advise.

  • Drew Rinella

    Reply Reply November 9, 2017

    That South African church terrorist attack being stopped by one guy with a 38 snubbie reminds me of a modern day David & Goliath. I watched an interview with him where he described the attackers had tossed grenades into the auditorium during the attack. A 38 defeated several guys with machine guns and grenades. Praise God.

  • Ed Burke

    Reply Reply November 9, 2017

    USAF. When I was in Basic @ Lackland, we were supposed to bivuack and go to the firing range. But it rained that day so we did not go. Truly.

    • left coast chuck

      Reply Reply November 9, 2017

      Ed: Even in the Army. When my cousin landed in Korea in June of 1950, was handed his 782 gear and a rifle and was told the bad guys were in that direction, that was the first time he had had a rifle in his hands since joining the Army a couple of years prior. Enlistments in the Army at that time were done with your Army job already selected. He enlisted for the Quartermaster Corps. No sense in wasting training time on the rifle range on a guy who was going to work in an office, so no need for a rifle. One of the reasons why he wanted to enlist in the Army was the judge gave him a choice Army or reform school. His peccadilloes with firearms is what landed him in front of the judge to begin with, so at least he had some casual firearms and casual combat experience before he entered the Army. It served him well. He managed to come back from the summer of ’50 and winter of ’51 without any holes in him.

  • Mike

    Reply Reply November 9, 2017

    He was in the Air Force. Few Air Force jobs require a member being proficient with firearms. “Military trained” for such people is about equivalent to the belief that a grammar school graduate in the USA can do the times table successfully from 1 to 10, let alone write their name.

    • Dewey Chadborn

      Reply Reply March 2, 2018

      Hey Chuck. I believe as “citizens” we have rights AND responsibilities. Just because I am not a Navy SEAL, does not relieve me from giving it my best shot. If a predator is intent on killing my fellow citizens, I feel bound by my duty as a male to engage this person in any effective means i have. I choose to have a firearm to help even those odds. My level of training and commitment are again my choice. If your choice is to run, I hope your family will be safe behind you, at least they may stop the bullets that are coming at your back!
      Any educator that has to face an active shooter should have access to the tools that they need, and should have access to training as well.
      WE THE PEOPLE need to take responsibility for our own safety and stop advocating our responsibilities to someone else! That’s my opinion!
      BTW I have the patents on a safe that along with training and instituting active shooter protocols, could change the conversation and to harden soft targets..

      • Ox

        Reply Reply March 2, 2018

        I’d like to hear about the safe, Dewey.

  • Dave

    Reply Reply November 9, 2017

    One of the aspects of current “training” is the political correctness watering down of mission. The mission is to kill the bad guy, not “stop” the threat. In other words, a couple of well placed shots to the torso may stop the threat but doesn’t kill the threat. The “threat” just detonated his vest or belt as he was bleeding out.

    Either shots to the torso followed up with a planting shot OR shots to the face, back of the head or throat and probably no planting shot is required.

    Remember the goal is to kill the enemy so they can do no further damage.

    • Ox

      Reply Reply November 9, 2017

      Hey Dave, I don’t say what I say because of political correctness. I say it because of liability. The goal must be to stop the threat and not to kill the threat.

      Many times, stopping the threat will end up causing the death of the threat. The attacker assumed responsibility for that potential outcome when they chose to use violence in the first place. The Tulsa police sniper situation from last month is a great example of this.

      But one thing that can happen is that if you program yourself to kill the threat instead of stop the threat, it’s not uncommon to have situations where 2, 3, 5 or more shots get fired after the threat has stopped or even turned around and started running. That causes big and unnecessary problems in court.

      History proves that you’re right and that sometimes, dropping the threat doesn’t stop it. Like the St. Paul Minnesota mall mass stabbing. Or the Ataturk airport bombing in Istanbul where the officer shot the bomber in the pelvis and dropped him to the floor. The only problem is, that didn’t stop the threat and the bomber hit his button.

      In the chaos of a life & death situation, I don’t think anyone’s going to make the right call 100% of the time…and it’s always easy to Monday morning quarterback a situation…especially if you can watch it unfold on video while sipping on a cup of coffee and so we want to train to both maximize our chances of physical survival (first) AND legal survival (second) without compromising on physical survival.

    • left coast chuck

      Reply Reply March 2, 2018

      Yeah, but you notice in both those bible quotes the shepherd was armed. He was protecting his flock. The pastor under discussion seems to rely on speedy response by law enforcement or the Jesus approach to self-defense. If I am ever caught without a mean of self-defense I will certainly try the Jesus approach otherwise I believe in tools of defense.

      • Ox

        Reply Reply March 2, 2018

        Good stuff, Chuck. Soldiers and warriors were ever-present in the New Testament and neither Jesus nor the disciples said it was something to avoid or to be ashamed of. Simon was armed, cut off the ear of the guard in the garden, and Jesus didn’t tell him to put down his sword…he told him to put it back in it’s place. For those who haven’t read it, I go into more detail on this here: http://dryfiretrainingcards.com/blog//guns-belong-churches-christmas/

  • left coast chuck

    Reply Reply November 9, 2017

    Hey, come on, he was Air Force. Not to put down the Air Force in the jobs that they do, they are outstanding, but they don’t get the kind of training an 11B or 0311 gets in the Army or Marine Corps. I was in the hospital a couple of times. That doesn’t make me a doctor.

    Secondly, why does everyone regardless of whatever lack of training they have feel qualified to comment on firearms? The pastor would be better served if he stuck to what he was trained for, expounding on the bible and leave the discussion of firearms and building defense to folks who have actual experience or extensive training in the topic at hand.

    I own a bible. To repeat my comment above, that doesn’t make me a theologian. Neither the Pope nor Billy Graham come to me for theological advice — well, actually, nobody does and that’s the way it should be. You might tell your good buddy the pastor something that is in the bible, “Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s” also applies to firearms. Or as we used to say in Uncle Sam’s Misguided Children, “Don’t work out of your M.O.S.” The actual words were slightly different, but this is a mixed group who reads this column so it was slightly edited.

    • TimBob

      Reply Reply February 20, 2018

      left coast chuck:

      Go read the 23rd Psalm. The shepherd is the protector of the flock and he carries a rod and a staff. Those were weapons.

      I also recommend reading 1 Samuel 17. It’s about a shepherd who was proficient with weapons; he protected his sheep from a lion and a bear. He also was not afraid to stand up against the enemies of Israel.

      Pastors are… shepherds!

    • Mark H

      Reply Reply March 2, 2018

      Dang…Left coast is right! Harsh to say the least, as IF your “AVERAGE” person can’t comment on THEIR safety with firearms. Anybody with even average COMMON sense should be able to chime in without having a Phd…geez

Leave A Response

* Denotes Required Field