This debate splits shooters almost as much as the 9mm vs .45 argument.
Both sides make some solid points…
And some that don’t really hold up.
So let’s look at what each method actually does well, where each one falls short, and how to blend them so you get the best of both without wasting time or ammo.
Let’s define terms real quick…
Sighted shooting (front sight focus) is where you focus on the front sight and let the target and rear sight blur. People call it “aimed fire” or “sighted fire,” but that’s not always accurate. All shooting is aiming—whether you’re using sights or not.
Point shooting has a bunch of names: threat focus, combat focus, instinctive, unsighted shooting, hip shooting, and more. It basically means your eyes are on the threat, not the sights, and you’re driving the gun to where you want the rounds to go using alignment you feel instead of verify.
BOTH are aiming…one is primarily kinesthetic/proprioceptive (unsighted) aiming and the other is sighted aiming.
To add to the complexity, many threat focused shooters bring the sights to their sightline and use awareness of the sights to aim, even if they aren’t focused on the front sight. JUST the name that people use to describe their method of unsighted aiming doesn’t tell you squat without a little explanation of what the words mean to them.
Here’s what each method brings to the table.
Sighted shooting has obvious advantages. If your sights are aligned and you don’t disturb them during the trigger press, you’re guaranteed to hit what you’re aiming at at typical self-defense distances. Sights have been on pistols for over a century for a reason—if they weren’t useful in fights, the military and law enforcement wouldn’t bother with them.
Once you know how to shoot with sights, you can pick up any sighted-in pistol and get accurate first hits. Calling your shots becomes automatic. And when all else fails, you can fall back on sight alignment, sight picture, and trigger press. Because sighted shooting relies on step-by-step fundamentals, most shooters get accurate faster with sights than with point shooting. Even after months without training, you can usually pick up a pistol and get your first aimed hits quickly. As long as time isn’t an issue, you can follow the steps and make it work, even with a less-than-perfect grip.
But sighted shooting has real drawbacks.
It’s not natural to shift your focus off a threat. Under stress, you may not be able to shift focus to your front sight at all. If you wear bifocals, trifocals, or readers, the sight picture gets even more complicated. Sighted shooting can also be slower, and for shooters with visual suppression or cross-dominance, it can be harder—unless you know how to train around it.
Point shooting has its own strengths. In many LE quals, the time limits practically force you to point shoot unless you’ve done serious vision-based training. It’s faster because you don’t have to wait for your eye to accommodate. It’s often easier for shooters with bifocals, trifocals, progressives, or convergence issues. And under actual life-threat stress, your eyes are going to be on the threat, not your front sight.
Cooper said it well:
“Pointer fire is not as hard to learn as sighted shooting, once you realize its range limitations,”
and
“its mastery is often the difference between life and death.”
Point shooting uses more than just your visual system—it also taps into your vestibular and proprioceptive systems.
And here’s a big one: despite what a lot of instructors claim, humans are not naturally accurate pointers. The research going back fifty years is clear. Pointing ability is trained and calibrated, not instinctive.
Of course, point shooting has its downsides too. The average person is not born with the ability to point a gun accurately. If you index your trigger finger on the slide and point at the target, your muzzle will be low. Straighten your finger on the trigger and point, and your muzzle will be high. The only way for finger and muzzle to perfectly match is with hand geometry that doesn’t happen in a correct modern grip. Point shooting takes more reps to develop, fades faster, and is heavily dependent on grip consistency. It also depends on your visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive systems being synchronized. And if you learned point shooting first—and did thousands of reps—it’s hard to switch to sighted shooting under stress if you didn’t build that bridge in training.
So which one is better?
People try to simplify it with “front sight for distance, point shooting up close” or “front sight when you’ve got time, point shooting when you don’t.” Those formulas are neat, but they’re built on the wrong assumption: that you’re supposed to choose one or the other.
If you go all-in on front sight focus, you cap your speed.
If you go all-in on point shooting, you cap your accuracy.
Train both separately and you waste time and ammo.
The real answer is integration…and multiple gears, just like you want/need on a car for different situations.
When you do it correctly, point shooting pre-aligns your sights for sighted shooting. And every sighted shot reinforces your point-shooting alignment. They feed each other. They build each other. And the combination gives you speed and precision faster than either method alone.
Here’s a drill you can try right now that makes this obvious:
Look at a target. Close your eyes. With an inert training platform or your unloaded and cleared pistol with a chamber block and a safe backstop, Draw. Present the pistol the way you always do. Stop when you think you’re aimed. Then open your eyes.
If your sights are aligned, your point shooting is lining up.
If they’re not, you would have missed at speed…possibly when lives depend on performance.
Fixing that alignment—getting your visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive systems to automatically agree—is exactly what I teach in Praxis.
If you want the fastest, most reliable way to blend sighted shooting and point shooting so you get both speed and accuracy without wasting reps, start here: 👉 Praxis Workshop . You’ll thank me later 🙂
10 Comments
John Ford
October 19, 2021My father, a WWII vet, taught me to shoot a pistol at an early age.
At that time most pistol sights were not very good.
I was taught point shooting by him and transitioned to sighted shooting much later in life.
At close ranges I still prefer point shooting.
John
Brian Sandman
June 25, 2020Greetings –
I was taught Point Shooting by Charles Smith at the Smith & Wesson Academy back in the 1980’s. Several overlapping features blend in to making this technique accurate within the 3-5 yard range. The basis is the triangulation of the body Center Line; eye; and the Body stance. It is unlikely to learn the technique from printed material alone. In the presence of a qualified Instructor with adjustments made allow a person to develop the proper awareness. The Firearm point has to be pushed out to the peripheral point where the eye may see the weapon for positional triangulation. Of course this is seldom noted. Plus the elbow needs to be tucked into the Center line to maintain accuracy. We even practiced with the Lights out to verify our correct positioning.
Ox
June 28, 2020Your comment brings back great memories 🙂 I really miss shooting Indoor Nationals and BUG Nationals at S&W.
What they were teaching in the 80s was pretty cutting edge at the time. We’ve had some tremendous leaps in our understanding of neurology…specifically how vision, balance, and hand-eye coordination/proprioception work together. The 2 most cutting edge trainings available today are our http://DynamicGunfighter.com training and Automatic Aiming
What you’ll find is that with the new approach that seamlessly integrates point shooting and sighted shooting, stance doesn’t matter anymore, peripheral awareness of the slide enhance precision, but isn’t required for hits, and the elbow no longer needs to be tucked into the center line.
All of these are vital because the older approach was more rigid than what many real-world shooting situations allow for…the new approach is quicker, more accurate, and more resilient across a wide range of adverse conditions.
Earl Davis
June 25, 2020I’m not anywhere near the level of folks on here, but I initially started with point shooting being heavily influenced by the whole WWII combatives approach (unarmed, knife, stick and handgun) ala Fairbairn, Sykes, Applegate and guys like Bill Jordan (No Second Place Winner). There is definitely a place for both. Col Rex Applegate was reported to have said if he had had more time to train folks he would have trained sighted fire first, but he was given limited to train folks going into harms way. I don’t think its an either or, you need both depending on circumstances.
Ox
June 25, 2020You mentioned some of my heroes.
One thing to keep in mind any time you read their statements on technique is how different sights are today compared to when they were shooting & training shooters.
It’s a completely different world and sights are MUCH easier to use quickly under stress today then they were even 30-40 years ago.
Applegate was correct on training sights before point shooting.
The problem is that if you habituate an EASY process before you habituate a process with additional steps, you’ll default to the easier process under stress and it’s a challenge to fix.
There’s definitely a place for both sighted and unsighted shooting, but if at all possible, you want to train a shooter to make sighted shots and get them making sighted shots for time under moderate stress BEFORE switching to unsighted shooting. This isn’t something that happens on the first day, 3rd day, or 5th day and any training that tries to make the switch before sighted shooting is habituated is going to give the shooter an artificial performance ceiling until it is fixed or remediated.
For someone like you who studied those masters…some of my heroes…and has habituated unsighted shooting first, what you want to do is be incredibly deliberate about getting a sight picture every time you present your pistol. It may be before your first shot, it may be after you’ve completed your entire string of fire, but you want to switch from seeing the unsighted shot as the last step to simply a step in the process.
We go into this quite a bit in the Praxis training and, done correctly, it will make you a better unsighted AND sighted shooter.
Jim in Jersey
September 14, 2018I’d actually have to disagree with Col Cooper on this one. I think there is a natural tendency to point a pistol at close range. Try it sometime.
Ever since childhood, when you saw your first cowboy movie, you recognized that the fastest way to shoot from a holster was to fire from the hip. Sure, hollywood is all crap… but I’ve been doing it with BB guns and .22’s since I could hold one. Years of practice with toy revolvers actually honed skills without even recognizing it.
Get a SIRT pistol if you’re scared and try it.
When you get older, and someone takes all the fun out of shooting a handgun….loads stress into the mix…right-eye dominant?… proper grip…sight picture…trigger control….squeeeeze… recoil!! Holy shit, no wonder everyone had to relearn.
At close/contact range, there is no need to bring a pistol up to eye level. You should be able to strike a target when and where you wish without the need for sights or a sight picture. It’s called hand/eye coordination. It works with throwing a ball, catching a frisbee and anything else you learned in your life.
The transition between ‘instinct shooting’ and aimed shooting should be equally seamless. There is no conscious switch that gets flipped that makes you realize you need to use your sights, you just do.
In my opinion and after 50+ years of shooting, I think we’ve made a simple, fun exercise into a chore for a lot of people. The guys who flourish are the guys who can pick up any handgun and shoot it well. They’re the ones who don’t fear or anticipate recoil and shoot a wheel gun as fast or faster than most shoot an autoloader.
In short, you should be doing both, practicing both and mastering both. If not, you’re struggling at close range and adding stress and pressure to an already volatile situation.
Don’t shoot everything like it’s 25 yards away.
Ox
September 14, 2018Hey Jim, you’re in good company…if you look above, even Col. Cooper disagreed with Col. Cooper 🙂
There’s a natural selection process that happens with shooting and I want to thank you for touching on it. You actually mentioned several things about the learning process that I’m very passionate about.
As you said, people who have the right wiring in their visual cortex and right coordination between their visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive systems tend to do well early with guns. They get “rewarded” with a positive outcome each time they pick up a gun. It’s natural for them. UNFORTUNATELY, a lot of “naturals” become instructors without understanding that there were some internal factors that allowed them to be as good as they are. When they run up against someone with a problem, they give the student the solution that worked for them, even though the student has a different underlying issue.
The sooner we can take someone who’s having problems with shooting…whether it’s because of vision, granular motor output to the hand, or something else…and start getting them consistent hits on target, the more likely they’ll become a long term shooter.
If we force someone who’s struggling to use the same process as someone who’s a “natural” then it’s going to be like banging heads into walls, but if we can take them from where they’re at, identify the underlying causes of frustration, and work through them, the entire process can be fun. (That’s why I mentioned point shooting initially on big close targets to learn trigger control)
Old Marine
September 14, 2018“I will not carry a pistol without some type of laser pointer on it.”
Greg
September 14, 2018Amen to that.
Dave B
September 14, 2018To me it’s a Yin/Yang thing. One cannot exist without the other, and the two are interdependent upon each other.
Leave A Response